Alright folks. Just a few months til election time. Let me set things straight. My idea of straight I'll preface. I'm just gonna assume no one is voting for Romney. I just imagine those votes come from some far-off sector of the U.S. populace that I live completely separated from. But nevertheless he will somehow get votes. So to counter them votes for a legitimate candidate need to be cast. That means you, all the young, frustrated 20-somethings with either a full or partial college education, need to vote. You don't need to vote for a Gary Johnson, he will not win no matter how hard you want a third-party candidate to.
My grandpa has an old saying, "Wish in one hand and shit in the other, and see which one you have more of". That definitely applies when it comes to elections. The media that most all of us watch like to push the idea that electing a new president will bring about great sweeping change, and that he or she will be some kind of savior, but we just need to figure out who is up to the task. While this sounds inspiring and sells ads, it is wrong. The president works within a system. This system has many components, the POTUS is only one part of this, although he is symbolically much more significant. You need to put that symbolism aside and realize that our current president has a job, and anyone who has a job knows that you can't run a company by yourself. Mr. O has not done everything you wanted him to because he cannot. He has made backroom deals and given a lot up to make progress where he can. He is an intelligent, well-intentioned, and hard-working president. He will not always make you happy, and he is not the perfect man for the job. But neither is any of the other hundred million some potential candidates. Nonetheless Barack is a good man for the job, and that is as much as you can realistically ask for.
You can vote for another candidate that better matches your views, and you may feel righteous voting authentically for the person you believe is best. But your vote is not some grand reflection of your beliefs, it is in actuality a grain of sand on a scale. And where your votes fall in aggregate will determine which way the scale tips. In this country that scale will only tip one of two ways. Think carefully about which way you want it to tip. If you truly want the best for our nation, you will put your weight on the side that actually tries and really wants to do good, even if that good gets blurred by compromises and setbacks. The other side is self-interested, and marred by silly ideas of what is right without respect to history, culture, or facts.
Don't blame the inefficiencies of our governmental system on the people who take part in it. It is a machine. An imperfect one, but only imperfect because it is of human construction. You can either add your drop of oil to this machine, you can add rust to it, or you can let it fall into disrepair by refusing to participate in its maintenance. I am begging all those of my generation who feel angry with our president for not being the messiah you hoped for to think long and hard about what will you make your future more bearable. Please help this 18th century machine stay in running order.
There used to be a sense of common good in this country, but it has been lost to cynicism over time. Please put aside your idealistic notions of a perfect world where everything goes your way, and work within the mundanity of the real world to try and make it better. There is a good reason why your brain, and not your heart, controls the functioning of your ballot-marking hand.
-Travis
P.S. I was gonna post this as my Facebook status bu then realized that it would probably be too long, and that would be stupid since one wants to read that on their feed. Thank God I figured that one out in time.
Travis's Blog
Friday, August 17, 2012
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Pumpkins
Back in October I brewed with my brother a spiced pumpkin ale, a recipe from Northern Brewer. For those of you who are unfamiliar, pumpkin ales are a popular seasonal beer made by many craft breweries across the country, with the original modern pumpkin ale being brewed by Buffalo Bills Brewery (which sadly earns only a C rating on BeerAdvocate). Most pumpkin ales are spiced with pumpkin pie spices and may or may not be made with pumpkin in the mash or boil. Our particular recipe had roasted, cubed pumpkin from our dear, sweet mother’s garden. But this post isn’t meant to be a lesson on beer, so let me continue, will ya?
A couple weeks after making our beer, I decided to research pumpkin beers a little. This is a common behavior of mine to research something after I already should have. It turns out that pumpkin ales and pumpkins in general have been of significant importance since colonial times. It makes sense after all, when I think of pumpkins, the first two things that come to mind are Halloween and pilgrims. My internet research started with and focused mostly on the beer part of pumpkins.
Pumpkin beers started as more of a wine than a beer, meaning they were not made with any addition of grains, but were made solely of pressed and fermented pumpkin juice, something which I really want to try making. These pumpkin beers were made out of necessity though, not out of some creative endeavor. The British had control over the import of barley malt and it was hard to get a hold of it in the Colonies before agriculture was established here. So colonists, including slave wooer Thomas Jefferson, used whatever fermentables they could get a hold of. And the only other alternative, not having beer, was not really an alternative back then. (History has always been on the side of beer)
Unfortunately, recipes and information on how to make these old pumpkin beers/wines is hard to find. So after beer forums failed me, I asked the Library of Congress. Apparently you can simply e-mail them a question and an actual librarian will answer you, no automated e-mails. So a kind woman named Alison responded to my inquiry with some resources for me to look at. Most of them required me to actually go to a library and check out books, but one was a link to a page about pumpkins in colonial times, which I read as I drank a bottle of my pumpkin ale and ate a bowl of pumpkin soup. What I already knew was that pumpkins, and the squash family of which it is a member, are native to the Americas. But I never realized how much they meant to the early settlers who went on to exploit, rape, and ravage the continent and its native people. Pumpkins were not used as decorations or to replace a horseman’s head, but they were a staple food. They were undoubtedly shared at the first Thanksgiving and due to their long storage life, they got a lot of colonials through the harsh pre-global warming/Al Gore winters.
While I consider myself no impassioned patriot, I do enjoy finding meaning in my heritage, whether it be ethnic, geographical, national, or anything else. When you identify yourself with a particular culture or other grouping, you really start to see how unique you are in terms of where you came from. Pumpkins are 100 percent American. They first grew here and they were what our historical idols ate, much more than you would think. Unfortunately the only real remnant we have of our country’s pompion-eating days is pumpkin pie. The big jack-o-lantern pumpkins that are most common nowadays were bred and popularized in the 70s.
I am by no means saying you should stop carving pumpkins or feel bad that you don’t like pumpkin pie (Although I guess I kinda am). But this Thanksgiving I ask that you take a look at the pumpkin sitting proudly in the middle of your parents’ dinner table centerpiece and think about how such an overlooked thing has so much more significance than we typically give it. And think about why you may just assume a pumpkin has the role it has. Then look over at everything else on your table and think about its significance. I ask you to do this not because I think you will have some great epiphany, but because when you look at what little things mean to other people or other times, you will find there is a lot more to the seemingly boring world around you, and you will feel a little better. Maybe. I guess what I’m saying is that this Thanksgiving, instead of going through the motions, you should give a little thanks of your own.
Inspirational source of post: http://www.history.org/foundation/journal/autumn09/pumpkins.cfm
What is a hipster?
I’ve been thinking and observing lately, and trying to
figure out exactly what one of these “hipsters” are. At first, when I was young
and naïve, I thought hipsters were simply those who wore tight pants, had
dreads, liked music too much, rode their bike everywhere, and alternately said “cool”
and “awesome” after every sentence you said to them. I thought hipsters were
ironic. But that’s just a lack of creativity. I also thought hipsters were characteristically
pretentious, but that’s not it either, that’s another breed of asshole. It
required me to dig deeper to find out what they are.
I moved to the Cities to go to school in 2009, and felt like
an outsider. I had nothing in common with the people of the city. I liked my space,
my car, and my isolation. But after spending more time here I fell in love with
Minneapolis and St Paul (yes, both of them). Before I even realized it I was
wearing flannel, wearing thick-framed glasses, listening to local music,
avoiding chain stores, reading just for fun, and getting way into craft beer. At
a certain point I realized I looked like a hipster, talked like a hipster, ate
like a hipster, and was more and more often being labeled a hipster.
I don’t consider
myself one, even though all hipsters deny they are one, but you will see why I
place myself outside of this realm soon enough. Anyways, back to my personal
journey to define these people, I realized at some point that that was the
problem. They aren’t a people. There is no point where someone decides to be a
hipster, and there are no certain criteria that qualify someone as a hipster.
This is how I became a “hipster” without even realizing it.
I decided that there are no hipsters, there are only hip
characteristics that a person can have. Are you a “locavore”? Are you a vegan?
Do you listen to vinyl and college radio? Do you live in Uptown/Northeast/West
Bank/Seward? Do you sport a scraggly beard? Do you go out of your way to ride
your bike? The list of questions goes on.
I can answer yes to a lot of these questions. But am I hip?
I still say no. I am urban. I live like a twenty-something college graduate in
a large city. Lots of people do, and I happen to be one of them. This is who we
are and this is what we do. We take advantage of the diverse offerings a large
city has to offer. No offense to the little rural towns like the one I grew up
in, but you just don’t have the population to support startup businesses, art
districts, indie music venues, beer festivals, co-ops, and 2-in-1 bike shop/coffee
shops. You do have something much more precious though. You have corn fields
and open spaces where you can do some really stupid stuff in your youth.
Something a life-long city-dweller will never have the chance to know.
But this isn’t about the contrast between urban and rural
life, this is about hipsters. And hipsters do exist I have most recently
concluded. But my point is that the difference is subtle between just a young
city-dweller interested in culture and a true identityless hipster.
So what is it you’re asking? You can’t read much more
without your attention span running out you say? Ok, hipsters are assholes, to
put it briefly. What defines them is not material by any means, it is not their
interests or their lifestyle or their dress. Hipsters and I both are urban,
both enjoy culture, both like things that are unique or “edgy”. But hipsters are
simply inauthentic assholes. That’s what it comes down to, an issue of
authenticity. Many people who are mistaken for hipsters are often people who
have a passion, and take it seriously enough where they don’t mind appearing weird
or different for it. But hipsters just do things to be hip and to feel included,
and they assume that everyone else views the world the same way. Hipsters take
nothing seriously; they love to drink, party, bone, pretend to be in love,
pretend to like art and generally do anything to live out the sentiment of “I
am young, I should fuck around as much as I can before I am old.” Plenty of
other kinds of people live like this, but hipsters do it with a sense of
obligation, as if they are wasting a precious opportunity by not doing it. And
they do it with their own hip style.
Hipsters have no authentic emotions. They don’t realize the
world around them is real, so they don’t take it seriously. They think the
world is there for them to judge. They are incapable of genuinely appreciating
things they like, but they are fully capable of judging and insulting that
which they don’t understand. Hipsters don’t want to identify with anything
because they don’t want any of the responsibilities that go along with caring
about something. So they steal the parts that make them feel hip and ignore the
things that would make them less so.
If I have just described you, please stop and become a real
person. You make me depressed.
-Travis
Friday, October 21, 2011
Inaugural Post
So I decided to start a blog. That sentence to me sounds like the title of a terrible how-to book. One of those books that tries (poorly) to act as a replacement for a formal college education. The kind of book a celebrity businessman would write because they know they can produce it cheaply and get enough unintelligent people with low self-esteem to buy it to make a few dollars off of it.
“So I Decided to Start a Blog”
By Travis Hochsprung
By Travis Hochsprung
Like many people nowadays, I have succumbed to the temptation to begin publishing to the web my personal thoughts for other people to see and judge me by. Like any successful amateur blog, mine will hopefully be read by a modest number of friends and family who will send compliments for the first few weeks and then dissolve back into their regular lives in which other people’s ramblings are entirely insignificant.
You may have picked up hints that I am not much of a blog man. You are correct. I am not. I absolutely hate writing just for the sake of writing. Not when other people do, I sometimes enjoy reading your typings. Writing myself is the problem. When the thought of just up and writing something comes into my conscience, I get infuriated. I have no clue why, but I begin to hate myself for considering it.
But I feel a lot of pressure to start writing. So many people I know have a blog or write regularly in some other form. I even ordered a friend to start a blog a few days ago. Plus I’m supposed to graduate this December with a journalism degree. On top of that I feel more pressure because of my irrational hatred of blogging. I know it isn’t reasonable and I should get over it, thus I have put pressure on myself to change without intention to do so.
I think all this weight might be why I hate writing. Since I was little, whenever I‘ve seen a pattern, trend or mutual agreement among people, I have fought it. I can’t help it, it’s my instinct. I naturally work against everything I feel I’m nudged into. This has been a great asset at times. If not for this feeling I would have turned out like the majority of everyone else from McLeod County. But more recently, in the past 2-3 years, I have realized more and more how it has been keeping me from a lot of experiences.
Starting this blog is a part of the reversing-my-instincts process. I will try this and see what happens. If I can find the motivation to keep this going, I will. This means people like you actually reading it and telling me how much fun you had doing so. Either that, or you wholeheartedly insulting me, thus inspiring me to continue out of spite. Read this blog, add it to your RSS feed, and bookmark it. If nothing else comes of this, at least a few of you will get a good look into how I think. I’ll put my next post up in a few weeks or days probably. It will be about winter.
And yes, I still hate this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)